updating the plan

tat_requirements/plan.md

@@ -13,6 +13,15 @@ Overview and order of work
 
 1. create tech documents, filling in as much prose as possible
 
+    - how do we deal with vocabulary hierarchy? 
+    
+'''
+INSERT INTO vocabulary (type, value) values ( 'subject', 'World politics--Periodicals' );
+INSERT INTO vocabulary (type, value) values ( 'subject', 'World politics--Pictorial works' );
+INSERT INTO vocabulary (type, value) values ( 'subject', 'World politics--Societies, etc.' );
+INSERT INTO vocabulary (type, value) values ( 'subject', 'World politics--Study and teaching' );
+'''
+
 1. create prototype software to test tech requirements, iterate updating requirements and prototype
 
 1. create tests for test driven development, and validate prototype
@@ -40,11 +49,28 @@ Code we write
 - SQL schema (Robbie)
 
   - exists, needs tests, needs requirements
+  
+  - should we re-architect tables become normal tables, the views go away, and versioned records are moved to shadow tables.
+  
+  - add features for delete-via-mark (as opposed to actual delete)
+  
+  - add features to support embargo
+  
+  - (maybe, discuss) change vocabulary.sql from insert to copy. It would be smaller and faster, although in reality as soon as
+    it is in the database, the text file will never be touched again.
+    
+- (discuss) can/should we create a tag system to deal with ad-hoc requirements later in the project? The tags
+  are very similar to vocabulary entryies in that the tag values are controlled. The difference being a weaker
+  moderation of tags and more readiness to create new tags (types). The tag table would consist of tag, value
+  and is essentially a name-value system. If we create tags, should we try to enforce some data typing, that
+  is: string, int, date, float, etc.?
 
 - CPF to SQL parser (Robbie)
 
   - exists, needs tests, needs requirements
   
+- Name serialization tool, selectable pre-configured formats
+
 - Name string parser
 
     - Can we find a grammar-based parser for PHP? Should we use a standalone parser?
@@ -53,6 +79,12 @@ Code we write
 
   - Can this use the same parser engine as the name string parser?
 
+- CPF record edit, edit each field
+
+- CPF record split, split data into separate cpf identities, deprecate old ARK, mint new ARKs
+
+- CPF record merge, combine fields, deprecate old ARKs, mint new ARK
+
 - coding style, class template (architect Robbie)